Non-Profit Posts

Understanding Michigan Sales and Use Tax Rules for Not-for-Profits

Many not-for-profit organizations assume that tax-exempt status automatically means exemption from sales and use tax. In reality, Michigan’s sales and use tax rules are more nuanced, and misunderstanding them can lead to unexpected liabilities, compliance issues, or missed opportunities for exemption.Understanding when exemptions apply and when taxes must still be paid is an important …

Many not-for-profit organizations assume that tax-exempt status automatically means exemption from sales and use tax. In reality, Michigan’s sales and use tax rules are more nuanced, and misunderstanding them can lead to unexpected liabilities, compliance issues, or missed opportunities for exemption.

Understanding when exemptions apply and when taxes must still be paid is an important part of maintaining compliance and protecting organizational resources.

Understanding Sales Tax vs. Use Tax

Before exploring exemptions, it is helpful to understand the difference between sales tax and use tax.

Sales tax is generally charged on taxable purchases made within Michigan.

Use tax applies when sales tax was not collected at the time of purchase, often involving online, out-of-state, or remote vendors. In these situations, the purchaser may be responsible for remitting the tax directly.

For many not-for-profits, use tax compliance is frequently overlooked because the obligation is less visible than sales tax charged at checkout.

Are Not-for-Profits Automatically Exempt?

One of the most common misconceptions is that federal tax-exempt status automatically exempts an organization from Michigan sales and use tax.

In most cases, this is not true.

While certain qualifying organizations may be eligible for exemptions under Michigan law, exemption from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) does not automatically eliminate sales or use tax obligations.

Organizations should evaluate their specific activities, purchases, and fundraising efforts to determine whether exemptions apply.

Common Areas of Confusion

Purchases Made by the Organization

Some purchases made directly by qualifying not-for-profit organizations may be exempt from Michigan sales and use tax. However, exemptions often depend on factors such as:

  • The organization’s exempt status
  • How the item will be used
  • Whether the purchase is made directly by the organization
  • Proper documentation provided to the vendor

If an employee or volunteer makes a purchase personally and later seeks reimbursement, the transaction may not qualify for exemption even if the item is ultimately used for organizational purposes.

Fundraising Sales

Many not-for-profits generate revenue through fundraising events, merchandise sales, auctions, or special campaigns.

These activities can create sales tax obligations depending on the nature and frequency of the event and the items being sold.

Organizations should carefully evaluate:

  • Merchandise sales
  • Ticketed events
  • Silent and live auctions
  • Online fundraising stores
  • Sales conducted through third-party platforms

Assuming that all fundraising revenue is automatically exempt can create compliance risks.

Online and Out-of-State Purchases

As organizations increasingly purchase software, supplies, equipment, and services online, use tax becomes more relevant.

If a vendor does not collect Michigan sales tax, the organization may still owe use tax on the purchase.

Regular reviews of accounts payable records can help identify transactions where use tax may apply.

Best Practices for Maintaining Compliance

Establish Clear Purchasing Procedures

Organizations should develop policies that identify:

  • Who may make tax-exempt purchases
  • Required exemption documentation
  • Approval processes for purchases
  • Procedures for tracking taxable transactions

Clear policies reduce confusion and help ensure consistent treatment of purchases.

Review Fundraising Activities Annually

Fundraising methods often evolve over time. A review of planned events, merchandise sales, and online fundraising activities can help identify potential sales tax considerations before issues arise.

Monitor Use Tax Exposure

Many organizations focus heavily on sales tax while overlooking use tax obligations.

Periodic reviews of vendor invoices and online purchases can help identify areas where use tax may need to be accrued and remitted.

Maintain Supporting Documentation

Organizations should retain exemption certificates, vendor documentation, invoices, and records supporting tax-exempt purchases.

Good recordkeeping can simplify audits and help substantiate exemption claims if questions arise.

Why This Matters

Sales and use tax compliance may not receive the same attention as financial reporting or annual filings, but it remains an important part of sound financial management.

Even small errors can accumulate over time, particularly for organizations making frequent purchases or conducting multiple fundraising activities throughout the year.

Understanding the rules helps not-for-profits avoid unexpected liabilities, strengthen internal controls, and ensure resources remain focused on advancing their mission.

How DBC Can Help

At DBC, we work with not-for-profit organizations to navigate complex tax and compliance requirements, including sales and use tax considerations.

Whether your organization is evaluating exemption eligibility, reviewing fundraising activities, or assessing use tax exposure, our team can help identify potential risks and develop practical compliance strategies.

Proactive planning today can help prevent costly surprises tomorrow while allowing your organization to remain focused on serving its mission and community.

This article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal, tax, or accounting advice. Because every organization’s circumstances are unique, we encourage you to consult with your legal, tax, or accounting advisor regarding your specific situation.

Stronger Not-for-Profit Leadership Starts With Stronger Board Partnerships

Not-for-profit leaders carry a tremendous amount of responsibility. They balance mission delivery, staffing challenges, fundraising pressure, board expectations, and community impact, often while working with limited resources. The commitment behind that work is undeniable. What becomes difficult, however, is sustaining momentum when leadership energy is constantly stretched across competing priorities. Strong organizations are rarely …

Not-for-profit leaders carry a tremendous amount of responsibility. They balance mission delivery, staffing challenges, fundraising pressure, board expectations, and community impact, often while working with limited resources.

The commitment behind that work is undeniable. What becomes difficult, however, is sustaining momentum when leadership energy is constantly stretched across competing priorities.

Strong organizations are rarely built through hard work alone. They are built through intentional leadership practices that strengthen relationships, improve governance, and reinforce organizational credibility over time.

Below are three areas not-for-profit leaders should prioritize to build stronger, more sustainable organizations.

Invest in Internal Relationships First

Leadership effectiveness starts internally. Before organizations can grow externally, leaders need strong relationships with staff and leadership teams.

Employees want to feel heard, valued, and connected to the organization’s mission. Leaders who create that environment often see stronger collaboration, higher engagement, and better long-term retention.

Simple actions matter more than many leaders realize. Listening carefully during conversations, inviting feedback, and acknowledging staff contributions all help build trust. Employees are more likely to stay engaged when they believe their work and perspective genuinely matter.

Formal authority alone does not create loyalty or respect. Those are earned through consistency, communication, and support.

Build a True Partnership With the Board

Board engagement is another critical area that separates thriving organizations from struggling ones.

Boards play an important governance and fiduciary role, but the strongest not-for-profits move beyond compliance-focused relationships. Effective leaders view their boards as strategic partners.

That partnership requires open communication and meaningful discussion around organizational direction, impact, and long-term priorities. Board members often bring valuable professional experience, industry insight, and community relationships that can strengthen decision-making when properly engaged.

One practical approach is to dedicate a meaningful portion of board meetings to strategic conversation instead of reports and operational updates alone.

For example, leadership teams and board chairs can guide discussion around questions such as:

  • What measurable impact are we having on those we serve?
  • What differentiates our organization from others in the community?
  • Where do we see the greatest opportunities for growth or improvement?
  • What risks should we be discussing more proactively?

Those conversations help boards become more engaged, informed, and invested in the organization’s success.

Communicate Impact Consistently

Many not-for-profits believe they are “the best-kept secret in town.” Unfortunately, that mindset can limit fundraising, community engagement, and long-term sustainability.

Organizations cannot assume donors, stakeholders, and community partners fully understand the value of their work unless that impact is communicated consistently and clearly.

Leaders should regularly evaluate how well they measure and share outcomes. This includes both quantitative metrics and meaningful stories that demonstrate mission impact.

A helpful question for leadership teams to consider is this: if your organization had a “stock price,” what would it reflect today?

While not-for-profits are mission-driven rather than profit-driven, organizational reputation still matters. Strong financial stewardship, measurable outcomes, and visible community impact all contribute to stakeholder confidence.

Donors are far more likely to support organizations that demonstrate results, strategic direction, and operational stability.

Leadership That Strengthens Long-Term Sustainability

Building stronger staff relationships, developing meaningful board partnerships, and consistently communicating impact are not independent leadership responsibilities. They work together to strengthen organizational culture, governance, and sustainability.

For many not-for-profits, these areas become even more important during periods of uncertainty or growth. Organizations that invest in communication, accountability, and strategic alignment are often better positioned to navigate operational and financial challenges over time.

At DBC, we work with not-for-profit organizations to support financial oversight, governance practices, and long-term operational planning. Strong leadership and sound financial strategy often go hand in hand when organizations are working to expand impact and strengthen sustainability.

To read the original article by Dennis C. Miller, visit: https://thenonprofittimes.com/npt_articles/partnering-with-the-board-3-key-areas-to-develop/

Understanding Functional Expense Allocation and Why It Matters

For not-for-profit organizations, financial reporting is about more than simply tracking revenue and expenses. It is also about demonstrating accountability, transparency, and responsible stewardship of resources.One area that often creates questions for organizations is functional expense allocation.While it may seem like a technical accounting requirement, how expenses are allocated can significantly impact financial reporting, …

For not-for-profit organizations, financial reporting is about more than simply tracking revenue and expenses. It is also about demonstrating accountability, transparency, and responsible stewardship of resources.

One area that often creates questions for organizations is functional expense allocation.

While it may seem like a technical accounting requirement, how expenses are allocated can significantly impact financial reporting, grant compliance, and donor confidence. A thoughtful allocation process helps organizations present a more accurate picture of how resources support their mission.

Understanding the Purpose of Functional Expense Allocation

Functional expense allocation refers to the process of categorizing expenses based on their purpose within the organization.

In not-for-profit financial statements, expenses are generally grouped into three categories:

  • Program services
  • Management and general
  • Fundraising

This reporting structure helps stakeholders understand how the organization uses its resources to support mission-driven activities compared to administrative and fundraising efforts.

For many organizations, this information appears in the Statement of Functional Expenses, which is required for certain not-for-profit entities.

Why Functional Expense Allocation Matters

Functional expense reporting provides transparency to donors, grantors, board members, and regulators.

It helps answer important questions such as:

  • How much of the organization’s spending directly supports programs?
  • Are administrative costs reasonable for the size and complexity of the organization?
  • How are shared costs being managed and reported?

Accurate allocation also supports stronger internal decision-making. When leadership understands the true cost of programs and operations, it becomes easier to evaluate efficiency, budget effectively, and plan for growth.

Common Expenses That Require Allocation

Some expenses clearly belong to a single function. For example, program supplies used exclusively for client services would typically be recorded as program expenses.

Other costs support multiple functions and require allocation across categories.

Common shared expenses include:

  • Salaries and employee benefits
  • Rent and occupancy costs
  • Technology expenses
  • Insurance
  • Utilities
  • Office supplies

For example, an employee who spends time overseeing programs, attending administrative meetings, and assisting with fundraising activities may have compensation allocated across multiple functional areas.

The key is using a reasonable and supportable methodology.

Choosing an Allocation Method

There is no one-size-fits-all approach to expense allocation. The appropriate method depends on the nature of the organization and the expense being allocated.

Common allocation methods include:

  • Time and effort tracking for employee compensation
  • Square footage for occupancy-related expenses
  • Headcount or usage-based calculations for technology and administrative costs

The most important factor is consistency. Organizations should apply allocation methods consistently from period to period and maintain documentation supporting how calculations were determined.

Clear documentation becomes especially important during audits or grant reviews.

Avoiding Common Allocation Issues

Functional expense allocation can become problematic when organizations rely on estimates without support or fail to review allocation methods regularly.

Some common issues include:

  • Inconsistent allocation practices
  • Lack of supporting documentation
  • Overallocating expenses to program services
  • Failing to update methodologies as operations change

These issues can create reporting inaccuracies and raise concerns during financial statement audits or regulatory reviews.

Regular review of allocation practices helps ensure reporting remains accurate and aligned with current operations.

The Connection Between Allocation and Strategic Planning

Expense allocation is not only about compliance. It also provides valuable operational insight.

Understanding the full cost of delivering programs can help organizations:

  • Evaluate program sustainability
  • Prepare more accurate grant budgets
  • Support funding requests
  • Make informed staffing and operational decisions

When organizations have a better understanding of where resources are being used, leadership can make more informed financial and strategic decisions.

Building Trust Through Accurate Reporting

Donors and grantors increasingly expect transparency around how organizations manage funds.

Clear and accurate functional expense reporting demonstrates accountability and reinforces confidence in the organization’s financial stewardship.

It also helps boards and leadership teams better understand operational costs and long-term financial needs.

A Final Thought

Functional expense allocation is an important part of not-for-profit financial reporting. While the process can feel detailed, it plays a meaningful role in transparency, compliance, and decision-making.

Organizations that take a thoughtful and consistent approach to allocation are better positioned to support their mission while maintaining strong financial reporting practices.

At DBC, we work with not-for-profit organizations to develop practical allocation methodologies, strengthen financial reporting, and support compliance requirements.

Whether your organization is refining its reporting processes or preparing for an audit, our team can help you evaluate your approach and build a stronger financial foundation.

What Not-for-Profits Should Watch as Federal Tax Changes Affect Charitable Giving

Changes to federal tax policy often create uncertainty for not-for-profit organizations, especially those that rely heavily on individual or corporate donations. While recent legislation may encourage more households to give overall, new research suggests total charitable giving could still decline compared to previous projections. According to a study from the Indiana University Lilly Family …

Changes to federal tax policy often create uncertainty for not-for-profit organizations, especially those that rely heavily on individual or corporate donations. While recent legislation may encourage more households to give overall, new research suggests total charitable giving could still decline compared to previous projections.

According to a study from the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, charitable giving in the United States in 2026 could decrease by approximately $5.69 billion under recent federal tax law changes. At the same time, researchers estimate the number of households making charitable contributions could increase significantly due to the introduction of a universal charitable deduction.

For not-for-profit organizations, these changes may create both challenges and opportunities.

Below are three areas organizations should evaluate as donor behavior continues to shift.

Understand How Your Donor Base May Be Affected

Not all organizations will experience these tax changes in the same way. The impact may depend heavily on where donations currently come from and how donors structure their giving.

Organizations that rely primarily on major gifts or corporate contributions could experience more pressure if tax incentives become less favorable for high-income donors and businesses. Meanwhile, organizations supported by broad community-based giving may benefit from increased participation tied to the universal charitable deduction.

Understanding donor concentration, giving patterns, and corporate funding exposure will become increasingly important as organizations evaluate future fundraising strategies.

Prepare for Changes in Donor Timing and Giving Patterns

The research also suggests some donors may begin adjusting how and when they give. Households or corporations near deduction thresholds may choose to “bunch” contributions into certain years to maximize tax benefits.

For not-for-profits, this could create fluctuations in annual giving patterns and cash flow timing. Organizations may need to adjust campaign strategies, donor communications, and financial forecasting to account for less predictable contribution schedules.

Smaller-dollar giving may also become more important over time. As more households become eligible for charitable deductions regardless of itemization status, organizations may have opportunities to strengthen recurring giving programs and broader donor engagement efforts.

Reevaluate Corporate Fundraising Strategies

One of the more significant findings from the research involves corporate giving. Researchers estimate corporate charitable contributions could decline under the new tax structure, reducing traditional tax-related incentives for businesses to donate.

As a result, not-for-profits may need to position corporate partnerships differently moving forward. Organizations that focus solely on tax advantages may face greater challenges than those emphasizing community impact, brand alignment, employee engagement, and long-term partnership value.

Corporate donors may still prioritize philanthropy, but the motivations behind those decisions could continue shifting away from tax strategy alone.

Balancing Uncertainty With Long-Term Planning

Tax policy changes rarely affect charitable giving overnight. Researchers note that donor awareness and behavior often evolve gradually as individuals and businesses become more familiar with new regulations and incentives.

For not-for-profit organizations, this creates an important opportunity to strengthen donor education, diversify fundraising strategies, and better understand how changing tax policies may influence long-term giving behavior. Organizations that proactively evaluate donor trends and communicate effectively with supporters may be better positioned to adapt as the philanthropic landscape continues to evolve.

At DBC, we work with not-for-profit organizations to strengthen financial planning, evaluate fundraising sustainability, and navigate evolving regulatory and economic conditions. Thoughtful planning and proactive communication can help organizations remain resilient during periods of change.

To read the original article by Paul Clolery, please visit:

https://thenonprofittimes.com/npt_articles/federal-tax-changes-might-cost-nonprofits-5-69b/

What Not-for-Profits Should Prioritize When Funders Rethink Due Diligence

For many not-for-profit organizations, due diligence can feel like a high-pressure compliance process focused primarily on identifying weaknesses or operational risk. Financial reviews, governance assessments, and policy evaluations are often necessary parts of securing funding, but traditional due diligence processes do not always reflect the realities organizations face, particularly those operating in resource-constrained or …

For many not-for-profit organizations, due diligence can feel like a high-pressure compliance process focused primarily on identifying weaknesses or operational risk. Financial reviews, governance assessments, and policy evaluations are often necessary parts of securing funding, but traditional due diligence processes do not always reflect the realities organizations face, particularly those operating in resource-constrained or politically sensitive environments.

As philanthropy continues to evolve, many funders are beginning to rethink how due diligence should work. Increasingly, organizations are shifting away from rigid vetting procedures and toward approaches that emphasize partnership, long-term sustainability, and organizational growth.

Below are three areas not-for-profits should pay close attention to as these conversations continue to evolve.

Understand Whether the Process Encourages Partnership

The tone and structure of a due diligence process can reveal a great deal about how a funder approaches its relationships with grantee partners. Processes focused entirely on compliance or deficiencies can create unnecessary barriers and discourage transparency from the beginning.

More collaborative funders are beginning to approach due diligence as a conversation rather than simply a checklist. Open-ended discussions give organizations the opportunity to explain operational realities, regional challenges, and long-term goals in a more meaningful way.

For not-for-profits, this shift creates opportunities to build stronger relationships with funders who value understanding context alongside financial oversight.

Evaluate Whether Funders Support Organizational Growth

Many not-for-profit organizations operate with limited administrative resources while still delivering meaningful community impact. Traditional due diligence frameworks often treat operational limitations as disqualifying rather than developmental.

Some funders are now recognizing that long-term sustainability may require investment beyond direct programming. Capacity-building support, governance training, improved financial systems, and operational development can all strengthen organizations over time.

Not-for-profits should pay attention to whether funders are willing to support organizational infrastructure alongside mission-driven work. In many cases, that support plays a significant role in long-term stability and effectiveness.

Pay Attention to How Funders Approach Risk

Organizations operating in challenging political, legal, or economic environments often face obstacles that make traditional compliance expectations difficult to meet. In some cases, strict funding requirements may unintentionally exclude organizations doing important community-based work.

Funders taking a more thoughtful approach to due diligence are beginning to recognize that meaningful impact sometimes requires flexibility and shared problem-solving. Alternative funding structures, regional partnerships, and customized operational approaches may help organizations continue serving their communities while strengthening governance and internal controls over time.

For not-for-profits, understanding how a funder approaches risk can provide important insight into whether the relationship will support long-term sustainability or create unnecessary operational strain.

Building Stronger Relationships Between Funders and Not-for-Profits

Due diligence remains an important part of responsible philanthropy, but it can also serve as an opportunity to strengthen communication, improve operational support, and build more sustainable funding relationships.

For not-for-profits, thoughtful due diligence processes often signal a funder’s willingness to invest not only in programs, but in the long-term health and sustainability of the organization itself.

At DBC, we work with not-for-profit organizations to strengthen financial oversight, improve governance practices, and support long-term operational sustainability. Strong financial management and meaningful partnership can work together to create more resilient organizations and stronger community impact.

To read the original article by Geraldine Moreno, please visit https://ssir.org/articles/entry/due-diligence-deeper-partnerships 

Best Practices for Board Financial Oversight 

In not-for-profit organizations, the board of directors plays a vital role in guiding mission, strategy, and accountability. One of the most important responsibilities a board holds is ensuring sound financial oversight. Strong financial governance not only protects the organization’s assets but also builds trust with donors, grantors, and the community. When board members understand their …

In not-for-profit organizations, the board of directors plays a vital role in guiding mission, strategy, and accountability. One of the most important responsibilities a board holds is ensuring sound financial oversight. Strong financial governance not only protects the organization’s assets but also builds trust with donors, grantors, and the community. 

When board members understand their financial duties and actively engage in oversight, they help create an organization that is transparent, compliant, and positioned for long-term sustainability. 

Understanding the Board’s Financial Role 

Board members serve as stewards of the organization’s resources. Their primary financial responsibilities include approving budgets, monitoring financial performance, and ensuring that appropriate controls are in place to prevent misuse of funds. 

Effective financial oversight involves: 

  • Reviewing financial statements regularly and asking clarifying questions  
  • Ensuring compliance with regulatory and donor requirements  
  • Overseeing internal controls and risk management practices  
  • Supporting long-term financial planning and sustainability  

While management handles day-to-day financial operations, the board’s role is to provide governance, accountability, and a big-picture perspective. 

Key Elements of Strong Financial Oversight 
  1. Review Financial Statements Regularly
    Board members should receive and review financial reports such as balance sheets, income statements, and budget-to-actual comparisons on a consistent basis. Look for trends, variances, and potential red flags. Clear,timely reporting ensures that the board can make informed decisions and respond proactively to financial challenges. 
  2. Maintainan Active Finance Committee 
    A dedicated finance committee can help the board fulfill its oversight responsibilities more effectively. This committee should work closely with management to review budgets, monitor cash flow, and assess financial policies before presenting recommendations to the full board. 
  3. Approve Realistic Budgets
    The board shouldparticipate in developing and approving the annual budget to ensure alignment with the organization’s mission and strategic goals. A well-structured budget balances program priorities with operational needs and includes contingency planning for unexpected expenses. 
  4. Ensure Proper Internal Controls
    Strong internal controls protect the organization from errors, fraud, and mismanagement. The board should confirm that key controls are in place such as segregation of duties, authorization procedures, and financial reviews and that they are tested periodically for effectiveness.
  5. Monitor Cash Flow and Reserves
    Cash flow management is essential for financial stability. The board should review cash flow projections and understand how reserves are being managed.Maintaining appropriate reserves provides flexibility and security, especially during periods of funding uncertainty. 
  6. Oversee Audits and Reviews
    Boardsare responsible for engaging independent auditors and reviewing audit results. This process offers valuable insights into the organization’s financial health and the strength of its internal controls. The board should also ensure that management addresses any recommendations identified in the audit report. 
  7. Support Transparency and Accountability
    Transparency in financial reporting builds trust among donors, staff, and the community. Boards should ensure that financial information is communicated clearly and accurately in annual reports, IRS Form 990 filings, and other public disclosures.
Encouraging Financial Literacy Among Board Members 

Not every board member will have a financial background, but every member should understand the basics of not-for-profit finance. Providing regular training on reading financial statements, interpreting budgets, and understanding compliance requirements equips the board to fulfill its oversight duties confidently. 

Encourage open dialogue during board meetings, creating a space where members feel comfortable asking questions and seeking clarification. A board that is engaged and informed contributes meaningfully to the organization’s financial integrity. 

Building a Culture of Financial Stewardship 

Financial oversight is more than a procedural duty. It is a reflection of organizational values. When the board prioritizes fiscal responsibility and transparency, it sets the tone for the entire organization. This culture of stewardship strengthens credibility, fosters donor confidence, and supports mission-driven growth. 

Proactive oversight ensures that financial challenges are identified early and addressed strategically, allowing the organization to remain resilient and focused on its goals. 

How DBC Can Help 

At DBC, we understand the vital role boards play in not-for-profit financial stewardship. Our team provides training, consulting, and audit services designed to help board members understand their financial responsibilities and strengthen oversight practices. 

Whether your organization is refining its internal controls, developing governance policies, or reviewing financial reports, we can help your board make informed, confident decisions that safeguard your mission and ensure sustainability by fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and financial strength. 

Succession Planning for Not-for-Profit Leadership and Financial Roles 

For not-for-profit organizations, leadership transitions are inevitable, but they do not have to be disruptive. Whether it is the retirement of a long-serving executive director, the departure of a finance manager, or the transition of a key board member, effective succession planning ensures that your organization’s mission continues seamlessly. By planning ahead, not-for-profits can preserve institutional …

For not-for-profit organizations, leadership transitions are inevitable, but they do not have to be disruptive. Whether it is the retirement of a long-serving executive director, the departure of a finance manager, or the transition of a key board member, effective succession planning ensures that your organization’s mission continues seamlessly. 

By planning ahead, not-for-profits can preserve institutional knowledge, maintain financial stability, and protect stakeholder confidence during times of change. 

Why Succession Planning Matters 

Leadership and financial roles in not-for-profits carry significant responsibility. These positions are often tied directly to the organization’s mission, relationships, and financial health. Without a plan in place, sudden departures can lead to confusion, gaps in oversight, and even risk to funding or compliance. 

Succession planning helps your organization: 

  • Prepare for both expected and unexpected leadership changes  
  • Maintain continuity in governance and financial management  
  • Strengthen long-term sustainability and resilience  
  • Demonstrate stability to donors, employees, and the community  

When managed proactively, leadership transitions can become opportunities for renewal and growth rather than sources of uncertainty. 

Identifying Key Roles and Responsibilities 

Effective succession planning starts by identifying which roles are critical to your organization’s success. For most not-for-profits, this includes: 

  • Executive leadership: Executive directors or CEOs who oversee mission, strategy, and community relationships  
  • Financial management: CFOs, finance directors, or accountants who ensure compliance, transparency, and fiscal health  
  • Board leadership: Officers who provide oversight, governance, and strategic direction  

Documenting key responsibilities, processes, and decision-making authority for these roles helps ensure continuity when transitions occur. 

Steps to Develop a Strong Succession Plan 
  1. Assess Current and Future Needs
    Evaluate your organization’s strategic goals anddetermine the leadership and financial skills required to achieve them. Consider how your needs might evolve over the next three to five years and identify any gaps in current capabilities. 
  2. Document Essential Knowledge and Procedures
    Capture key processes, contacts, and institutional knowledge before a transition occurs. Maintaining up-to-date job descriptions, financial procedures, and access controls ensures smoother handoffs and minimizes disruption.
  3. Develop Internal Talent
    Encourage professional development for current staff andidentify potential future leaders within your organization. Cross-training team members on financial and administrative tasks not only prepares them for advancement but also enhances organizational resilience. 
  4. Establishan Emergency Transition Plan 
    Unplanned departures can occur without warning. Create an interim leadership strategy that designates who will assume temporary responsibility for key functions until a permanent replacement is found. 
  5. Involve the Board Early
    The board of directors plays a crucial role in leadership continuity. Engage them in planning discussions and ensure they understand their responsibilities in overseeing transitions for both executive and financial roles.
  6. Review and Update Regularly
    Succession plans should be living documents. Revisit them annually to reflect organizational changes, updated job roles, and emerging priorities.
Maintaining Financial Continuity During Transitions 

Leadership changes often impact financial operations, making careful planning essential. To maintain stability: 

  • Ensure dual authorization for financial transactions and system access to prevent gaps in oversight  
  • Review internal controls to confirm that duties are properly segregated, even during temporary transitions  
  • Keep funder relationships informed to maintain trust and transparency throughout leadership changes  
  • Engage external advisors to provide continuity in accounting, audits, and reporting when internal transitions occur  

A proactive approach to financial continuity reinforces confidence among stakeholders and prevents interruptions in day-to-day operations. 

Building a Culture of Preparedness 

Succession planning is not just about filling positions. It is about building a culture of preparedness. When organizations view leadership continuity as part of long-term strategy, they empower employees, reassure donors, and strengthen community trust. 

Investing in leadership development today ensures that tomorrow’s transitions are handled with professionalism and stability, keeping your organization focused on its mission even during a time of change. 

How DBC Can Help 

At DBC, we understand that leadership and financial transitions can be complex. Our team works with not-for-profits to strengthen internal controls, establish clear succession processes, and ensure financial continuity through periods of change. 

Whether you are developing your first succession plan or refining an existing one, we provide the guidance and support to help your organization maintain stability, accountability, and confidence by building systems that sustain your mission over time. 

 

Grant Management and Financial Reporting Best Practices 

Grants are an important funding source for many not-for-profit organizations. They allow organizations to expand programs, serve more people, and strengthen their community impact. Managing grant funds, however, requires careful oversight. It calls for transparency, accountability, and accurate financial reporting. Clear grant-management processes help ensure funds are used appropriately, compliance requirements are met, and funder trust is maintained. Why Strong Grant …

Grants are an important funding source for many not-for-profit organizations. They allow organizations to expand programs, serve more people, and strengthen their community impact. Managing grant funds, however, requires careful oversight. It calls for transparency, accountability, and accurate financial reporting. 

Clear grant-management processes help ensure funds are used appropriately, compliance requirements are met, and funder trust is maintained. 

Why Strong Grant Management Matters 

Every grant includes specific expectations. These may involve spending guidelines, reporting deadlines, or performance outcomes. A structured approach helps your organization meet those expectations while maintaining financial control and audit-readiness. 

Effective grant-management practices help organizations: 

  • Maximize the impact of awarded funds 
  • Reduce compliance risk 
  • Improve communication with funders and auditors 
  • Strengthen future funding opportunities 

Well-organized systems make it easier to demonstrate responsible stewardship. 

Core Elements of Effective Grant Management 

Develop clear policies and procedures 
Document how grants are applied for, approved, tracked, and reported. Written policies support consistency and year-end reporting accuracy. 

Assign clear responsibility 
Designate a grant manager or defined team. Clear ownership improves coordination between program staff and finance staff. 

Track each grant separately 
Maintain distinct budgets within your accounting system. Use classes, projects, or cost-centers to prevent overlap and improve reporting clarity. 

Monitor spending regularly 
Compare actual expenses to approved budgets throughout the grant period. Early review reduces last-minute adjustments and reporting issues. 

Maintain thorough documentation 
Keep organized records of invoices, payroll allocations, and supporting documentation. Clear records simplify audit preparation and strengthen internal controls. 

Financial Reporting Considerations 

Accurate reporting supports compliance and reinforces credibility. 

Reconcile consistently 
Financial reports should align with your accounting records and approved grant budgets. Regular reconciliations reduce errors. 

Distinguish restricted and unrestricted funds 
Clear classification ensures compliance with donor intent and improves financial transparency. 

Align program results with financial data 
Spending should directly support the funded initiative. Ongoing communication between departments supports accurate reporting. 

Conduct internal reviews 
A structured pre-submission review helps identify inconsistencies and ensures clarity before reports are submitted. 

Supporting Long-Term Stability 

Strong grant-management practices do more than satisfy compliance requirements. They support long-term sustainability. When financial processes are clear and well-documented, organizations are better positioned for future funding and continued mission growth. 

How DBC Can Help 

DBC serves as a trusted advisor to not-for-profit organizations seeking stronger grant-management systems, clearer financial reporting, and greater audit-readiness. If your organization is preparing for growth, new funding, or increased oversight, this is a good time to evaluate your current processes.  

Reach out to the DBC team to discuss how your current systems are supporting compliance, reporting, and long-term stability. A thoughtful review today can help strengthen the financial foundation that sustains your mission tomorrow. 

Using Client Accounting and Advisory Services for Transparent Reporting 

For not-for-profit organizations, transparency is essential to maintaining trust. Donors, grantors, board members, and regulators expect clear reporting and responsible stewardship. Delivering that level of oversight can be difficult without the right financial structure in place. Client Accounting and Advisory Services provide both operational support and strategic insight to strengthen financial management and reporting. What Are Client Accounting and Advisory …

For not-for-profit organizations, transparency is essential to maintaining trust. Donors, grantors, board members, and regulators expect clear reporting and responsible stewardship. Delivering that level of oversight can be difficult without the right financial structure in place. 

Client Accounting and Advisory Services provide both operational support and strategic insight to strengthen financial management and reporting. 

What Are Client Accounting and Advisory Services? 

Client Accounting and Advisory Services combine day-to-day accounting support with higher-level financial guidance. Services may include bookkeeping, payroll, financial statement preparation, internal control support, cash flow monitoring, and ongoing advisory discussions. 

This approach allows organizations to move beyond basic compliance and gain: 

  • Reliable, timely financial data 
  • Real-time access through cloud-based systems 
  • Structured internal processes 
  • Ongoing financial insight to support leadership decisions 

The goal is not just accurate reporting, but informed decision-making. 

Why Transparent Reporting Matters 

Clear financial reporting reinforces credibility and supports long-term sustainability. It demonstrates that resources are managed carefully and in alignment with donor intent. 

Strong reporting practices help organizations: 

  • Maintain funder confidence 
  • Support grant and regulatory compliance 
  • Improve board-level oversight 
  • Identify financial trends early 

Accurate, consistent reporting strengthens accountability across the organization. 

How Client Accounting and Advisory Services Support Transparency 

Timely financial visibility 
Up to date financial data allows leadership to monitor spending, program performance, and cash flow throughout the year. 

Structured reporting processes 
Consistent financial reporting supports grant compliance and audit-readiness while reducing last minute pressure at year-end. 

Strengthened internal controls 
Additional oversight improves segregation of duties and reduces risk, particularly for organizations with lean accounting teams. 

Clear tracking of restricted and unrestricted funds 
Proper classification supports compliance and improves reporting clarity. 

Ongoing advisory insight 
Regular financial review and planning discussions help leadership stay proactive rather than reactive. 

A Stronger Financial Foundation 

Client Accounting and Advisory Services provide more than just operational support. They offer an ongoing partnership built on consistent oversight and practical financial guidance. 

With the right structure in place, not-for-profit organizations can improve reporting accuracy, strengthen internal processes, and develop financial systems that support sustainable mission growth. 

How DBC Can Help 

DBC provides Client Accounting and Advisory Services tailored to the needs of not-for-profit organizations. Our team supports daily accounting functions while also providing thoughtful financial guidance to help leadership make sound decisions. 

If your organization is looking to strengthen reporting, improve oversight, or prepare for future growth, DBC can help you build a financial framework that supports both compliance and long-term stability.

When Pivoting in a Crisis, What Should Small- and Medium-Sized Not-for-Profits Prioritize First?

Periods of crisis force leadership teams to move quickly. Revenue shifts, program demand changes, and uncertainty increases pressure across staff and board. When facing disruption, many leaders immediately focus on diversifying funding or launching strategic planning conversations.  Those steps matter. However, crisis response often requires deeper structural decisions that are less comfortable but more …

Periods of crisis force leadership teams to move quickly. Revenue shifts, program demand changes, and uncertainty increases pressure across staff and board. When facing disruption, many leaders immediately focus on diversifying funding or launching strategic planning conversations. 

Those steps matter. However, crisis response often requires deeper structural decisions that are less comfortable but more impactful. 

Below are three areas small- and medium-sized not-for-profits should evaluate early when pivoting. 

Make Clear Decisions About Staffing 

In times of instability, staffing structure deserves immediate review. Not-for-profits often delay difficult personnel decisions due to strong values around inclusion, loyalty, and belonging. While those values are important, maintaining roles that no longer align with strategy or financial reality can weaken the entire organization. 

Crisis periods often clarify which positions are essential to the organization’s future and which may be better suited for transition. Leaders should assess: 

  • Whether current roles align with the core mission and theory of change 
  • Whether workload distribution supports productivity and morale 
  • Whether the organization can sustainably fund each position 

If separations become necessary, they should be handled with transparency and fairness. Establishing clear, values-based severance policies supports both employees and organizational credibility. Financial sustainability and compassion are not mutually exclusive, but they must be balanced thoughtfully. 

Reevaluate Physical Space and Overhead 

Office space is another area that warrants review. The relationship between not-for-profits and physical space has shifted significantly in recent years. Many organizations no longer require the same square footage or fixed-location commitments they once did. 

Leaders should ask: 

  • What type of space is truly necessary to deliver programs effectively? 
  • How often is the space used, and at what cost? 
  • Could hybrid or shared-space models reduce overhead without harming service delivery? 

Reducing or restructuring space is not simply a cost-cutting exercise. It requires operational planning, clear policies for hybrid work, and investment in effective collaboration systems. If an organization pivots to remote or hybrid operations, it must also establish expectations for communication, accountability, and team cohesion. 

Evaluate Funding Alignment, Not Just Funding Volume 

During financial pressure, it can feel counterintuitive to step away from revenue. However, not all funding supports long-term sustainability. 

Grants and contracts should be evaluated for mission alignment and full-cost coverage. Leaders should assess: 

  • Whether funded programs still align with strategic priorities 
  • Whether the funding source covers true direct and indirect costs 
  • Whether accepting the funding requires maintaining roles or expenses that no longer serve the broader mission 

Funding that drives strategic drift or sustains non-core programming can create long-term strain. In some cases, choosing not to renew a grant or contract is a proactive decision that strengthens focus and impact. 

Walking away from misaligned funding signals clarity about purpose and reinforces disciplined governance. 

Balancing Strategy With Structural Change 

Diversifying revenue and engaging the board in strategy discussions remain important crisis responses. However, structural decisions around staffing, space, and funding alignment often have the most immediate financial impact. 

Crisis pivots require courage and careful change management. Clear communication, transparent decision-making, and alignment between board and leadership are critical throughout the process. 

At DBC, our not-for-profit specialists work with organizations to evaluate cost structures, assess funding sustainability, and align operational decisions with long-term mission goals. Thoughtful analysis and proactive planning can help organizations navigate disruption while protecting financial health and organizational integrity. 

To read the original article by Jeanne Bell, please visit https://nonprofitquarterly.org/when-pivoting-in-times-of-crisis-what-should-small-and-medium-sized-nonprofits-prioritize-first/ 

 

About us

De Boer, Baumann & Company provides professional accounting, tax, and business advisory services to individuals and businesses in West Michigan and the surrounding areas. With expertise in a variety of industries, DBC specializes in comprehensive and innovative solutions to help clients achieve their financial goals.